Classic 3-D horror films... not for sale in 3-D

3-D movies I want to own, or, I've got a 3-D TV and I want to use it

3-D movies are back in the cinemas, having appeared in various incarnations for over a hundred years. But for the first time, a high quality 3-D experience is also available at home. Until this new wave of 3-D televisions were available, we've only been able to use cardboard red/blue or red/green glasses to watch DVDs and videotapes for a fairly poor 3-D experience. Watching a blurry VHS of Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare in 'Freddy Vision' wasn't an immersive experience. But now that there are new 3-D systems, in high definition, I think 3-D is here to stay, especially with the bonus uses for video games and computing applications...

I've always enjoyed 3-D cinema, after being so excited to discover that some classic horror movies had been made that way. I've hunted down special screenings over the years and have seen all my favourites in 3-D (the BFI ran several 3-D seasons in London, for instance).

I'm now enjoying this new wave of 3-D, especially the CGI animation, like Ice Age 3. The process has been used and abused in many action films where it's at odds with fast editing and disorientating camera movement. Even less effective are the 'faked' 3-D movies that post-produce dimensional effects from 2-D recordings. Though this 'post-produced' 3-D has been effectively revitalising older animated feature films. The first 'unflattened' Disney films I saw in the cinema was The Nightmare Before Christmas (now 3-D on Blu-ray) in 2008 (though it was first released in 2007), and it gave us false hope that all 'fake' 3-D was going to look as good.

Of the recent live-action films, 3-D works best for me with a slow-moving or static camera looking at deep sets. Joe Dante's The Hole (2009) is a lightweight horror for youngsters with some effective Japanese ghostly apparitions, but the constant and inventive 3-D visuals are wonderfully designed. I've yet to see Martin Scorsese's Hugo.

Hollywood studios seem to have reached an across-the-board agreement not to remind present audiences that visually, this isn't much different from the previous 3-D crazes that all faded away. They've not released any of the older 3-D movies using the new technology, no matter how good the 3-D effects were. Obviously, with two prints or negatives involved, twice the restoration work would be needed, but I thought they were short of product to justify us buying brand new 3-D TVs?

Normally I like to share my gripes about stuff 'Not on DVD'. But this new 3-D system only works with Blu-ray. So here's my pick of classic 3-D horror movies 'Not on Blu-ray'...

In the 1950's, the movie business was terrified by the erosion of audiences by that new gadget, TV. People could stay at home and watch movies, so why go to the cinema? So studios had to offer what TV couldn't. Wider screens, bigger screens, stereo sound and 3-D - all innovations that appeared at great expense to keep the industry thriving.

3-D movies were shot with two cameras (and still often are), presented on their first run in cinemas on two synchronised projectors, and viewed with polaroid spectacles. It's a myth that the first big audiences for 3-D wore red-and-green glasses in the 1950s - they were seeing sharp 3-D images using a very similar process as we get now.

Only on re-release would the single-strip red-and-green prints be distributed. Small cinemas and even colleges could then show the slightly inferior 'anaglyph' version of 3-D. I don't think I've ever seen a polaroid presentation - it's always been with two-coloured glasses. All the more reason that I'd like to see these films in HD 3-D.

Like now, not all 3-D movies are good, but The Creature From The Black Lagoon (1954) is still great fun, even when viewed 'flat'. But it uses some great grabs at the audience with huge razor claws, and some fantastic dimensional scenes underwater, that makes the 3-D very entertaining. It's also a classic monster movie with a fantastically well-designed creature suit. Though the underwater version didn't have an air supply. Diver Ricou Browning had to hold his breath for each take.

That was a roaring success, so the first sequel Revenge Of The Creature (1955) was also shot in 3-D. The second sequel, The Creature Walks Among Us, was made after the 3-D boom went bust, and was shot 'flat'.

An early close encounter, based on a Ray Bradbury story, is the frankly scary It Came From Outer Space (1953), which even hurls flaming meteors at the camera to make audiences duck and cover. All three of the above films were directed by Jack Arnold. This has an eerie 'body snatchers' plot with aliens victimising a remote town in the desert.

I must also mention The Maze (1953), even though it's yet to surface even on DVD. It stars Richard Carlson who's also in all three of the above movies! This is a mystery that takes place in a Scottish castle. The 3-D is effectively planned by legendary production designer-turned-director, William Cameron Menzies, who also made Invaders From Mars the same year. I first enjoyed this in one of the BBC's Saturday night horror double-bills in the 1970s and have been waiting for it to be rediscovered ever since. More about The Maze here.

So far, the movies I've mentioned are all black-and-white, but an expensive colour film really launched the 3-D format in America. The original House of Wax (1953) starred Vincent Price at the start of his horror career. It practically defined the rest of his movie roles. Charles Bronson (above) makes an early appearance as his mute assistant.

The 3-D highlights of the film include the hooded killer stalking the foggy streets, the camera prowling through the wax museum, and, ahem, the guy with the paddle and ball...

Even Alfred Hitchcock made a 3-D movie during this period, Dial M For Murder. Surprisingly, his use of the third dimension was quite restrained and the story suffers from obviously being based on the confined shenanigans of the stage play. Still, Grace Kelly in 3-D...

The bubble burst after only a few years, making 3-D a rare oddity for several decades. An exception was The Mask (1961). Most of the story is filmed flat, in more ways than one, but the 'dream sequences' are exceptionally well-filmed in 3-D, with trippy scary scenes revolving around a sacrificial netherworld. There was an anaglyph (red/blue) release recently on DVD. The film is black and white and cited as Canada's first horror film! More about The Mask here.

In the 1970s, it was still rare, though this is when one of the greatest 3-D horror movies was thrust into view. Andy Warhol's Flesh For Frankenstein (1973) was made in 3-D, presumably to add extra kitsch value. This benefited from the start of the next generation of 3-D filming, with a new film format that made it possible to halve the cost of shooting in 3-D, with both images shot on the same strip of film. Besides saving money by only needing one camera, this meant that older issues of alignment (two cameras having to be perfectly positioned) and synchronisation (film damage on one print might make it slightly out of synch with the other) were now also solved. This is also why the best 3-D that followed was 2.35 widescreen - both widescreen images were stacked in the space of where one 35mm image normally was.  

Director Paul Morrissey gave us the first in excessive 3-D gore, which pre-empts and exceeds much of the blood-letting in the 3-D Friday the 13th movie that followed. Bad taste, bad acting, great 3-D. This outrageousness tops my wishlist for a proper 3-D release.

The 1980s enjoyed the next 3-D boom, using the over/under 2.35 process to great effect for Jaws 3-D and Friday the 13th Part 3 3D. While they're not the greatest movies, the 3-D is very sharply presented. This Friday really deserves a great 3-D release to show how good they could make it back then. It's also the only way to understand why everyone is firing stuff at the camera.

Freddy's Dead - The Final Nightmare cheated (in many ways) by only having a 3-D finale, by the time my eyes had adjusted, the scene was over! It looked even worse in 3-D on VHS (above). I'm mentioning this for Freddy fans, I don't actually want to see this again...

While I was preparing this article, the good news was that Friday the 13th Part 3 3D is getting a 3-D release on Blu-ray. The bad news is... it won't be using the new 3-D technology, but the old red/blue 'anaglyph' process. Therefore you won't need a 3-D television to enjoy it. Why is this?

Jaws 3-D has also been announced for a Blu-ray release later this year and again won't be using the new 3-D technology, the same as the Friday the 13th Part 3 3D release. Glasses will be provided with the Blu-ray. No artwork is available yet.

 

Basically, horror fans with a new 3-D TV have nothing old to watch!

FURTHER READING:

3D Movies by R. M. Hayes.
Chunky textbook attempting to document every single release in the first 100 years of 3-D cinema.

Fantastic 3-D - A Starlog Photo Guidebook.
An easy reference guide, lots of colour photos, but published before the end of the 1980s 3-D boom.

A concise history of cinema 3-D - on the Wide Screen Movies site.


3-D Online Magazine horror special...